Sir Jim Ratcliffe, having recently acquired 27.7% ownership of Manchester United, has taken control of the club’s footballing operations. However, his decision to potentially offer Mason Greenwood a lifeline at Old Trafford amidst his loan spell at La Liga’s Getafe risks stirring internal discord.
Ratcliffe deems it illogical for United to heavily subsidize Greenwood’s £75,000-a-week wages while on loan, especially considering the player’s previous valuation of over £50 million. He is determined to explore avenues for reintegrating the 22-year-old into Erik ten Hag’s squad, despite Greenwood’s loan stint in Spain following the dropping of legal charges against him.
Expressing a commitment to “a fresh decision,” Ratcliffe emphasizes the importance of considering the club’s values in such matters, sparking controversy within United’s ranks. This move challenges the initial decision made by former CEO Richard Arnold, who faced significant backlash from fans, celebrities, and even members of parliament when considering Greenwood’s return earlier.
Ratcliffe’s willingness to reconsider Greenwood’s role post-acquisition of a significant stake in United is met with mixed reactions internally. However, driven by his business acumen and intent on reviving the club’s fortunes, Ratcliffe aims to restore United’s glory days, refusing to let go of a promising talent like Greenwood without exploring all options.
With just a year left on Greenwood’s contract upon his return from loan, United’s decision-making regarding his future is under scrutiny. Despite not featuring for United since January 2022 due to suspension and ongoing investigations, Greenwood’s impressive loan spell has attracted interest from clubs like Barcelona, adding complexity to the situation.
